It Doesn't Have To Be Right…

… it just has to sound plausible

300 years from now is 2312


I’ve been saying for a while now that science fiction doesn’t need improbable spaceships and magic technology in order to generate sense of wonder. There’s plenty of wonder in the universe as we know it, once you accept its vast size and implacable hostility. So the prologue of Kim Stanley Robinson’s 2312 comes as a real pleasure to read. It is set on Mercury, and describes a sunrise as seen from the terminator. The world is in fact inhabited, and most of its inhabitants live in a city, called Terminator, which travels around the world on rails, forever staying within the twilight zone.

Mercury is not the only planet in the Solar System that has been settled. Mars not only has a thriving colony but has also seceded from Earth control. As indeed have the many moons and asteroids which have been colonised – and which now form the Mondragon, named for the Mondragon Corporation, a federation of workers cooperatives in Spain founded in 1956. Venus too has also been settled, and it is the fate of the human settlement of Venus which partly drives the plot of 2312.

Such a near-ish future scenario, with its strict adherence to realistic science, and plausible and clever extrapolation of technology and society, seems guaranteed to appeal to me. So it feels a little churlish to complain that 2312 falls a smidgen short of being a truly great science fiction novel.

Alex, one of the Mondragon movers and shakers, has died (of old age) and it is up to her friends to see that her plan continues. These friends include Swan Er Hong, Fitz Wahram, Inspector Genette, and others. The nature of Alex’s plan is only gradually revealed to Swan, though she is happy to involve herself. This initially requires travelling to Titan with Wahram. As they travel about the Solar System, the two fall in love, despite not seeming to suit each other particularly well. As they travel, Swan learns that Alex’s plan is a response to a secret conspiracy with unknown aims.

2312 is a novel comprising episodes spaced along a timeline in which a mostly-hidden conspiracy gradually reveals itself and its objectives. There is, for example, the destruction of Terminator. There is the discovery of qubes (quantum computers) in human form – rather than surgically-embedded qubes in humans, such as Swan’s companion Pauline. (Qubes are not artificial intelligence per se, though something like it emerges from their complexity.) There is the destruction of a travelling asteroid terrarium (a common means of transport about the Solar System) and the deaths of all those travelling within it. There is the reseeding of Earth with the fauna which had populated the terraria. There is a covert civil war on Venus.

In truth, the conspiracy is the weakest element of 2312, and not every event seems linked to the story it powers. The reseeding of Earth, for example, is clever and exciting, but doesn’t feel like part of the same narrative which sends Swan and Wahram gallivanting about the Solar System. And the resolution of the conspiracy, when it’s revealed in a disappointingly offhand fashion, feels like an after-thought rather than the resolution of a dramatic narrative.

Yet the Solar System of 2312 is a fascinating place. It feels like a valid extrapolation in ways that many nearish-future science fictions – such as James SA Corey’s poor Leviathan Wakes – do not. To some extent, this emphasis on world rather than plot does make the novel feel somewhat like a travelogue. But 2312 is not a plot-driven novel. It is dramatic in discrete moments, and it is sense of wonder, the continuity of the characters’ perceptions and the deepening relationship between Swan and Wahram, which chains those moments into a linear narrative. 2312 is like its terraria, it is a small world put together from elements of the real world, and in which a life unlike those we can experience ourselves can be lived. It’s no surprise then that the conspiracy which opens with the destruction of Terminator feels like a feeble counterpoint to the journey on which Robinson takes the reader.

As a genre novel – ie, a narrative reliant on plot for its backbone – 2312 is somewhat unsuccessful. As a science fiction in a more general sense, a personalised exploration of an invented universe, with its Dos Passos-seque “extracts” and “lists”, 2312 is superb. It may well be Robinson’s strongest work since the Mars trilogy. I wouldn’t be surprised to see it on a few shortlists next year; and I’d be disappointed if it wasn’t nominated.


15 thoughts on “300 years from now is 2312

  1. > As a genre novel – ie, a narrative reliant on plot for its backbone

    Um. You state this as if it is axiomatic or a given. It’s news to me. Says who?

    I would say that many of KSR’s genre novels are not plot-driven, and in a way, that’s what I like about them: it lends them a distinctive flavour. It’s arguably true of the RGB Mars trilogy, /Icehenge/, /The Years of Rice and Salt/, Antartica and the Science in the Capital trilogy and others too.

    Other writers noted for non-plot-driven SF novels include Greg Egan and Jack Vance, and I believe Ronald Wright’s /A Scientific Romance/ was a good example too, though I’ve not (yet) read it myself. (Former Vector paperback reviews editrix Tanya Brown rated it very highly, as I recall.)

    • Genre novels generally are driven by plot, unlike literary fiction. I can’t think of any Vance novels offhand which aren’t plot-driven, though most of them are close to picaresque. I’ve only read one Egan novel and a handful of short stories.

      I wouldn’t say Icehenge didn’t have a plot – each of the three novels definitely do, and together they form a story-arc. The same is true of the Mars novels – there’s a clear narrative impetus from start through to finish in each of the books. Though I’ll agree KSR is less plot-driven than 99% of sf writers.

      I have A Scientific Romance on the TBR somewhere.

  2. A genre novel does not need to be reliant on plot. It just happens that plot shows off more as if diverges from our reality. Science Fiction novels can be driven by plot, but it’s not a requirement. It’s a by-product.

  3. Is it entertaining? Is it engaging? Do the characters come to life? Are the descriptions of the world tied to character POV?

    I stopped reading KSR after the Mars trilogy. Yes, it had moments of brilliance, but (for me at least, at the time) it also had long-winded parts to plough through. Ploughing, I think, because the characters receded, because descriptions had too little character POV and feeling (for my taste).

    • Just illustrates /de gustibus non est disputandam/ or something like that. RGB Mars are among my favourite novels of all time & I’ve reread the whole sequence 4 or 5 times or more, plus the spinoff stuff like “Arthur Sternbach Brings the Curveball to Mars”, “Climbing Mt Olympus”, the very sad “White Mars” and of course the anthology /The Martians/.

      • I think the Mars books are superb. I’m not too fond of ‘Arthur Sternbach Brings the Curveball to Mars’ as I hate baseball stories as much as I hate tall-tales-told-in-a-pub type stories. And I’ve yet to read The Martians, though I’ve owned a copy for years.

        Er, you’ve not said if you’ve read 2312 yet…

  4. I sent my review of 2312 to Interzone a month ago. (It comes out in another month or so and I don’t want to preempt it but in that light it was interesting to read your take on it.)

  5. Pingback: Turn that frown upsidedown « It Doesn't Have To Be Right…

  6. Pingback: Some recent readings « It Doesn't Have To Be Right…

  7. Pingback: Best of the year 2012 « It Doesn't Have To Be Right…

  8. Pingback: Nebula Nominations Announced - Page 2 - Science Fiction Fantasy Chronicles: forums

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.