It Doesn't Have To Be Right…

… it just has to sound plausible

Self-publishing – one year on…

11 Comments

Whippleshield Books is now just over one year old and has to date published two books, one of them an award-winner. Although I started up the press in March 2012, and published Adrift on the Sea of Rains on 9 April 2012, Whippleshield Press’s online presence didn’t happen until 25 May 2012. So that’s a handful of days over twelve months, plus or minus a month or two. It has been… an interesting year.

Any discussion of self-publishing is sure to be over-shadowed by the likes of Hugh Howey and Amanda Hocking. They have been amazingly successful at it – and, to be honest, I can’t see why. I’ve read Wool, it’s not very good. Which pretty much demonstrates there is no magic formula to success at self-publishing. Something in Wool clicked with a large number of people, but whatever it was it’s far from obvious. What this means is that Howey is not an expert on self-publishing, and has very little that’s useful to add to the debate. And, in all fairness, he has admitted as much: this is what worked for me, he has said, but it doesn’t mean it will work for you. The media, however, are only interested in success stories, as if somewhere in every one of them is an obvious recipe for success. There has been some discussion recently of such “survivor bias”, and to anyone with any common sense it’s plain that luck is not a transferable skill. If one ticket wins the lottery, buying the ticket with a number one up from it does not mean you will also win.

Commercially, Whippleshield Books has not been a “winner”. I’m okay with this – I didn’t set it up to make me pots of money. If anything, I expected it to be a financial burden for much of its life. Happily, it went into the black in March this year… but then the ecommerce annual fee came due and I also had to reprint Adrift on the Sea of Rains. But it’s been back in the black since the beginning of May and seems likely to remain there. Whether it’ll have earned enough to pay the cost of producing book three of the Apollo Quartet is a different matter, however. I’ve been funding Whippleshield Books out of my own pocket so far, so if it doesn’t it won’t affect my planned publishing schedule.

Speaking of which, I’ve received three submissions in the past twelve months. One I bounced immediately as not meeting the guidelines. The other two I rejected after requesting the full ms. To be honest, I had expected to be sent more, even if most would prove completely unsuitable. I can only surmise I’m the only person writing the type of fiction I want to publish. Happily, I’m not the only person who wants to read it, as sales for the first two books of the Apollo Quartet have shown:

AQ1

The two spikes are due to mentions in the Guardian (here and here). The second one coincided with Adrift on the Sea of Rains winning the BSFA Award, so the win may also have contributed. But given that the full novella was published in the BSFA Award booklet for members, I suspect it didn’t have that much effect. I’ve added “WINNER OF THE 2012 BRITISH SCIENCE FICTION ASSOCIATION AWARD” to the product description on Amazon, but I’ve no idea if that has had any impact.

Adrift on the Sea of Rains continues to sell well on Kindle – better in the UK than in the US, it must be said. The number of Amazon paperback orders has also picked up, typically now around one a week. Of course, I’d sooner those sales took place on the Whippleshield website, but I know of no way to drive customers there from Amazon. When I mentioned in a previous blog post that Kindle sales were “more or less pure profit”, someone on a forum responded: “I had to laugh at this one. Shows a real lack of understanding of the costs involved in running a successful website. Electronic files take up disk space which has to be paid for. The transfer of electronic files uses bandwidth that has to be paid for”. To which I can only say, if you’re paying for storage of a single electronic copy of your book, and can actually work out the cost of uploading that file to Amazon, then I suspect other people are laughing at you.

AQ1format

The Eye With Which The Universe Beholds Itself has not been selling quite as well. Nor has it been reviewed as extensively as Adrift on the Sea of Rains (review e-copies of The Eye With Which The Universe Beholds Itself are still available, incidentally), though the genre venues that have reviewed it seem to have taken to it slightly better than Adrift on the Sea of Rains. But then I did write it in such a way to force a reading protocol more tuned to sf readers.

AQ2

Of course, The Eye With Which The Universe Beholds Itself has only been available since late January this year, so around four months in total. And word about Adrift on the Sea of Rains is still making its way throughout the genre landscape – such as making an appearance on SF Squeecast here, courtesy of Paul Cornell. Two books is a slim presence, especially given that they’re novellas too. I’ve had no short fiction published in genre venues with large audiences, at least not yet. So my platform remains small, and still chiefly confined to the UK.

Interestingly, Wunderwaffe, a short story of 9000 words which originally appeared in Anarchy Books’ Vivisepulture anthology, and which I produced as a chapbook limited to 12 copies before publishing it on Kindle, has been selling surprisingly well in the US. This may due to its low price. The $1.16 price-point, and the clearly stated length of 27 pages, however, hasn’t prevented a couple of people from leaving one-star reviews complaining that it isn’t a novel. I’m especially impressed by the review which states “stick to established authors that don’t give short stories under the cover of a book”. I think you’ll find “established authors” have also been known to publish short stories on Kindle too. In fact, John Scalzi’s latest novel was serialised, with each chapter sold as a separate ebook (not entirely the same thing, I know, but you know what I mean).

So there you have it – Whippleshield Books after twelve months. More or less. Plans for world domination may have to be put back another year or so. I believe Adrift on the Sea of Rains is the first self-published work to win a BSFA Award – although there are a couple of self-published works in this year’s Hugo shortlists. The stigma attached to the word “self-publishing” is slowly being eroded, but that doesn’t mean the self-published market is still not full of badly-written and poorly-edited derivative rubbish. But the good stuff is getting easier to find. I like to think that Whippleshield Books is, and will be, seen as a purveyor of that “good stuff”.

About these ads

11 thoughts on “Self-publishing – one year on…

  1. Good of you to share your sales numbers–the fact that you’re operating in the black is quite remarkable (not too many indie/self-publishers can say the same). That you have achieved as much as you have (the great reviews and the award) speaks well of your talent and perseverance.

    You’re right, the indie world is gradually producing some decent writers…but there are still far too many hobbyists and wannabes excreting their awful rubbish. Less than 1% of it good, the rest mediocre to unbelievably inept. On the other hand, have you strolled through the “New Release” section of a major book store lately? Seen the kind of shit that gets vetted by major publishers these days?

    Good writers can’t compete with the shit; never have, never will. But, Ian, you’re carving out a lovely niche for yourself, accumulating a body of work that will draw more and more smart readers your way. It’s a gradual process and you have to be hellaciously patient…trust me, you’re on the right track and there are even BIGGER things ahead.

    You lucky bastard…

    • The figures are a little fiddled – I’ve not, for instance, included the cost of my own time, editor, cover-artists, etc. Or the books I’ve specifically bought for research purposes. But in terms of bills due for, and income directly to, Whippleshield Books, yes, it’s been in the black all this month.

      I wouldn’t say I wasn’t a “hobbyist”. I still have a day job, and all the writing and self-publishing (and running websites/blogs, etc) gets done in the evenings and on weekends. I take my writing seriously, obviously; and I’m committed to writing to a specific vision, rather than banging out generic product in order to find an audience. It’s more important to me that the fiction I want to write is written rather than whatever I might write is published.

  2. A hobbyist you ain’t, Ian. You’ve made a lifelong commitment to the printed word…and it shows. In your writing AND your publishing.

  3. As a writer of badly-written and poorly-edited derivative rubbish I resent the stigma you so unreflectingly

  4. Pingback: One Year On… | Panglossian Hubris

  5. You’re entitled to your opinion, but you should label it as such. When you say WOOL is not very good, that’s your opinion not fact. Millions of readers and hundreds of critics disagree. Of course, millions of readers love “Fifty Shades of Gray,” which hundreds of critics agree is horrible. So popularity does not equal good, but I would hesitate to put WOOL in that category

    Congratulations on your continued success. Selling even dozens of copies in a crowded fielddw

    • Is an achievement (got cut off)

    • Actually, no. Wool is a demonstrably bad book – as I explain in my review of it in the latest issue of Interzone. And while millions of readers may have enjoyed the book, and confused “enjoy” with “good”, that does not mean the book is well-written. Millions of people enjoy Big Macs but that doesn’t mean they’re haute cuisine. But you point this out yourself in reference to Fifty Shades of Gray. Well, Wool is exactly the same.

      I’ve also yet to see any of these “hundreds of critics” who think Wool is good. And you’ll note it didn’t appear on any award shortlists this year – and that’s not because it was originally self-published. As I’ve proved myself, that’s no longer a barrier – see also Seanan McGuire on the Hugo shortlists.

      Otherwise, thanks :-)

  6. Pingback: Self-Publishing One Year On (via @ian_sales, HT @LindaNagata) | Literarium – The Blog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,840 other followers